Hey oh y'all,
So today we visited another WWII museum – and you know what
that means…first young reader discretion advised…Also this is rambly/ranty so
feel free to skip this one.
DISCLAIMER TIME!!! – This is by no means meant to be an
academic essay. This is just a summary of our visit and WWII class discussion.
If I had time enough, I would go back and limit my abuse of overgeneralizations
and go to cite resources and be more acceptable in an academic sense, but I
just want to communicate some of the general narrative as I loosely (and very
loosely at that) understand it. I encourage you to take my points as basis for
future exploration only – please do challenge what I say here. I look forward
to your response.
Summary:
We went to a “revisionist” view WWII museum
History is a weapon
Japan has 2 major narratives – Yushukan (Japan did “nothing
wrong”) and Ritsumeikan (Japan did “everything wrong” – these are not quotes
just overgeneralizations)
Is “rewriting” history inherently wrong?
Is peace and truth and the like possible?
So we finished our Tokyo tour at Yushukan Museum at Yasukuni
Shrine. Yasukuni Shrine, originally founded in 1869, was a State Shinto shrine
dedicated to those who died in the loyal service of the Emperor. So post-WWII,
this now includes all Japanese who died in WWII…and yes…this includes some guy
named Hideki Tojo who was executed for doing something bad? I don’t know, but I
get the feeling that this shrine likes Japan during WWII….
I mean take a look at the museum – it’s pretty much the
cleanest version of Japanese colonization I’ve seen (then again, I haven’t seen
too many clean versions to begin w/ - but when you talk about the “Chinese
incident” without mentioning any atrocities – see I don’t know…attacking villagers,
comfort women, human biological testing, POW abuse – you have to raise your
eyebrows a bit…)
But on the surface it sounds really nice – what did Japan do
during the late 1800s, early 1900s? It liberated Asia from the evils of Western
Colonization. And what was its role during WWII? It was fighting a defensive
war against the evil United States which put crippling economic sanctions on
the rising Japan. And Pearl Harbor? Japan had made every effort to talk with
the US to remove the sanctions and prevent war. And of course big, bad US
attacked the Japanese people.
Here is where things get interesting – atrocity issues
aside, this narrative is not technically outright wrong. The Western world was
colonizing Eastern Asia and Japan did fight against Western Powers (mainly
Russia but we’ll call it a Western power for the sake of discussion). And the
US did put crippling sanctions on Japanese imports, especially oil leading
Japan to need to take more colonies and Pearl Harbor was not “illegal” per se (since
at the time international laws regarding preemptive strikes were not yet put in
place).
Oh and did the US also commit civilian damage? City
firebombing and atomic bombing anyone?
Thus there are two main points of the museum – Japan did not
commit atrocities, and Japan fought a justifiable/honorable war
These are separate points. Do I support a museum that almost
blatantly ignores even the controversy of war atrocities? No. But do I
understand a museum that paints its home country in a positive light? Yes.
Doesn’t almost every country (especially the US) do this? I would say so.
Have you every been to a US war museum? One of the main
displays is often a collection of war medals ie honoring US soldiers who kill
and are killed.
In fact, Yushukan reminded me very much of a US WWII museum
– it was well lit (in comparison to the dark, depressing Ritsumeikan Peace
Museum), there were poems and quotes about honor and bravery, and the story at
face value describes people fighting for their country and honorable emperor
all the way from samurai times to WWII – add in a few war planes, letters from
the front and a timeline showing how the evil powers oppressed the glorious
home nation and call it a day
I mean – all you have to do is change the flag and the word
emperor to democracy and you’ve got the makings of a great US museum…even the
atomic bomb is relatively glossed over….
Personally, I find American WWII memorial and museums
inspiring – people were willing to make the ultimate sacrifice to defend people
who they have never met, never would meet, and never imagined would exist. For
the US (who won), this portrayal is fine. But for Japan, they are somehow held
to a different standard, making this museum in some ways less acceptable.
Writing history in such a way that your country looks good
isn’t inherently wrong so long as it’s not outright lying (then again what’s
the difference between lies and good advertising?). I would go and say this is
almost natural in order to instill a sense of national identity – both victors
and losers do this.
But when differing views of history hamper reconciliation
such that it threatens the safety of your people – like angering Chinese public
such that they attack Japanese stores over a Japanese official making or not
making a statement on colonial/WWII issues? I’m not trying to sound preachy but
something should be at least looked at here.
Of course, that’s not to say that
WWII reconciliation is in any ways easy. Even Germany, often hailed for
reestablishing amicable Western European ties by making numerous reparations
and official apologies, still faces issues regarding war crimes.
Japan faces issues abroad and at
home with regards to its official position the war. Having the US also legally
object to new petitions for reparation due to the Treaty of San Francisco
doesn’t help new talks either. I have no idea how or if such reconciliation is
even possible – the country itself is split on its views of WWII and colonial
policy – and the longer you wait to deal with something the harder it is to
solve.
DC